How splitting the farm can bring clarity to transition
Tuesday, August 16, 2022
Reference: FCC
The following is a fictional case study created by MNP. It is recommended you discuss your options with a qualified advisor.
Darlene and Ian started transition planning when they turned 50. At the time, their two children, Glen and Amy, were in university and had no idea if they would return to the farm. Ten years later, both children committed to returning full time. They had both been active on the farm as youngsters but had been encouraged to take time away after graduation to explore work and have other experiences before deciding on farming.
Now in their late 20s, Glen and Amy have been more involved in the family business for the past five years. They were doing well, and with oversight from their parents, had settled into a division of tasks and responsibilities. But Dad and Mom still ran the show, and the kids wanted more ownership and autonomy.
Amy’s personality was to get up and get at it. She liked the daily challenges, solving problems and getting things done. She was also very good with employees and kept the team on track. Glen was more analytical and tended to spend more time on budgets, marketing and planning. They had complementary skills, but they came at things from different perspectives.
Darlene and Ian were pleased that both children showed work ethic, management skills and commitment to the farm, but worried about the long-term realities of the two kids working together. With Glen planning to marry his long-time girlfriend in the coming year, new dynamics and relationships would be at play.
As Glen and Amy’s involvement in the farm increased, and divisions of tasks, abilities, work styles and personal preferences were identified, Ian and Darlene decided to split the farm into two separate corporations – a crop side and livestock side. The original farm company was the owner of all the farmland.
A portion of the assets of the original farming company would be transferred to Glen’s new company, and some or all the remaining assets to Amy’s company (both being considered family by CRA)... Read More
Darlene and Ian started transition planning when they turned 50. At the time, their two children, Glen and Amy, were in university and had no idea if they would return to the farm. Ten years later, both children committed to returning full time. They had both been active on the farm as youngsters but had been encouraged to take time away after graduation to explore work and have other experiences before deciding on farming.
Now in their late 20s, Glen and Amy have been more involved in the family business for the past five years. They were doing well, and with oversight from their parents, had settled into a division of tasks and responsibilities. But Dad and Mom still ran the show, and the kids wanted more ownership and autonomy.
Logical division of duties
Like many sibling relationships, Glen and Amy had each other’s backs, but got into some heated arguments. It wasn’t always optimal to be working shoulder to shoulder. It was better if they had separate tasks, and if they needed help, they could ask for it. The relationship between Amy and her dad differed to how Glen and Ian interacted. Amy quickly deferred to Dad’s opinion, where Glen often challenged him and wanted to go his own way.Amy’s personality was to get up and get at it. She liked the daily challenges, solving problems and getting things done. She was also very good with employees and kept the team on track. Glen was more analytical and tended to spend more time on budgets, marketing and planning. They had complementary skills, but they came at things from different perspectives.
Darlene and Ian were pleased that both children showed work ethic, management skills and commitment to the farm, but worried about the long-term realities of the two kids working together. With Glen planning to marry his long-time girlfriend in the coming year, new dynamics and relationships would be at play.
Seeking professional advice
They shared these concerns with their transition specialist and got to work updating the transition plan. Darlene and Ian planned to fully step away from the farm in five years, at age 65. They had previously incorporated the farm and put all land into the company, and the company owned any new land.Dividing up the farm
A common way to transition farm businesses to the next generation is dividing the existing farming company into two or more separate companies, each headed by one of the incoming children. This is sometimes called a butterfly split.As Glen and Amy’s involvement in the farm increased, and divisions of tasks, abilities, work styles and personal preferences were identified, Ian and Darlene decided to split the farm into two separate corporations – a crop side and livestock side. The original farm company was the owner of all the farmland.
A portion of the assets of the original farming company would be transferred to Glen’s new company, and some or all the remaining assets to Amy’s company (both being considered family by CRA)... Read More
Sign up to stay connected
- News
- Property Alerts
- Save your favourite properties
- And more!
Joining Farm Marketer is free, easy and you can opt out at any time.